For R&D teams
Solved problems live in lab notebooks and leave when people do. IPGuru extracts the disclosure in conversation, attaches the prior art, scores it, and hands your committee a file it can act on.
Recognize yourself?
Solved problems live in lab notebooks and leave the company when people do.
Invention disclosure forms compete with the next technical problem, and lose every time.
Your IP committee receives disclosures of wildly varying quality and completeness.
You want to prove a better process on one team before changing anything company-wide.
What you walk away with
The FORGE method is proprietary to IPGuru: you approve the evidence at every gate, and a weak Grade loops the work back instead of letting it through.
Focus
Nova interviews the inventor the way a patent engineer would. Twenty minutes of talking replaces the form nobody fills in.
Observe
Each one searched across 250M+ patents before the committee sees it, so meetings run on evidence.
Refine
Uniform disclosure documents with figures, 3D models and short explainer videos, so a review board compares like with like.
Grade
Weak disclosures fail fast and cheaply. Strong ones arrive at counsel credible, with reasoning attached.
Execute
A complete file for counsel or the IP committee, carrying the evidence trail and the name of the person who solved it.
A two-sided PDF of this persona, made to forward or print.
From the platform
Teams typically start with three candidate disclosures from the existing backlog and compare the output against what the current process produced last year. The pilot's outputs are yours either way.
The backlog of unwritten disclosures is the business case.
rocket_launch Start free